We Need to Ban the Term ‘Bullying’!

What used to be normal childhood behaviors are now seen as pathological and dangerous. Have we gone too far with the label "bully?"

Independent School Magazine recently published an article, “Why Our Approach to Bullying is Bad for Kids,” by Susan Porter.  Porter set out to investigate the apparent surge in bullying among children, as reported in multiple media.  What she learned was that the incidence of bullying had not increased so much as the definition of bullying had changed and expanded.

Bullying used to mean acts of physical harassment between children, beating up a smaller child or repeated hate speech.  Now bullying includes all sorts of behaviors, including social exclusion, name-calling, teasing, and generally being unfriendly.  Also the negative outcomes of bullying have been expanded from school phobia and depression to include feeling upset or being sad.  Porter learned in her research that bullying now means any of the “routine” acts of selfishness, meanness, teasing, and other social misfires that characterize childhood and adolescence.

What is troubling to Susan Porter (and to me) is that what used to be normal childhood behaviors are now seen as pathological and dangerous.  Adults are creating unrealistic guidelines for children’s behaviors in an effort to try to prevent all children from feeling any pain or discomfort from unsuccessful social interactions.  Like many other aspects of our lives, adults seem to be trying to create a construct for children that, in the end, inhibits a child’s ability to learn from mistakes and to develop resilience in the face of adversity.

Porter believes that using the label “bully” creates a fixed mindset that speaks to a child’s character rather than the child’s behavior.  When we label a child a “bully” or a “victim”, not only do adults then tend to view these children in that context, children themselves, who are very concrete, see themselves through the lens of the label, often to their detriment.  Porter also argues that when we embrace this fixed mindset, it lets everyone off the hook of doing the difficult work of helping children to truly change behavior, develop compassion and empathy, and to learn how to face adversity and develop resilience, all of which take time and patience.  The adults end up not helping children to grow, and these situations are exacerbated by the divisiveness it can cause between parents and between parents and the school.

Porter recommends abandoning the rhetoric that has overtaken this issue and investing our energies in understanding normal childhood development and in developing policies and programs that foster a growth mindset.

This article resonated with me, as I have long held that the use of the terms “bully” and “victim” has run completely amok.  All too often, today’s adults have lost perspective, and through their reactions escalate situations well beyond the actual event itself.  Our unrealistic desire to protect our children from any and all adversity, failure or discomfort is having the completely opposite result.

It is time for parents and educators to help children reclaim normal childhood development, including learning to cope with and conquer adversity, conflict and failure, along with celebrating successes.  We need to refocus and do a much better job in distinguishing what is true bullying, which tends to be rather rare, and what is typical, though still unacceptable, inappropriate social interactions between children.  We then need to be prepared to do the hard work of helping children to grow emotionally and socially, which takes time, effort and patience.  This is certainly our commitment at Hillel.

Susan Porter’s book, Bully Nation:  Why America’s Approach to Bullying is Bad for Everyone, will be released in the spring of 2013 and is a must-read for everyone committed to the growth of our children.


This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Connie Knie January 23, 2013 at 04:45 PM
Gerry I certainly didn't mean to offend. Like I said I have not been in this position so I am not speaking from experience. But what is the difference between believing you do not fit into society because your peers say so and being a victim? What is the definition of victim if not that??
Kurz January 23, 2013 at 05:18 PM
To say our society only has two categories of youth (victim and bully) is really oversimplifying the complicated social lives of children in today's world. I have school aged children and the children today are taught very early on not to label and the schools do not tolerate that either (it would be a form of bullying for so called "victims" to call a another child a "bully") From my experience schools with their "bully" policys have done an excellent job teaching all children how to be enpowered to voice their feelings when they are being taunted and how to recognize what bully behaviour looks like and how to react. You might not like the term bully but it is being used as a term to describe a behavior so it can be recognized, NOT as a label of individual children. School bully policies teach the concept that sometimes we all use bully behavior to get what we want (i.e. I won't be your friend if you don't do what I say) and all children need to understand how that behavior affects others so it can be self regulated and peer regulated as well in favor of information learned. I can only speak from experience at the grade school level, the early years, which is where all this should be learned and enforced, (in my opinion anyway) so that children can go on to middle and high school with a strong foundation of self power and be able to feel secure in the belief that society frowns on bullying behavior.
Connie Knie January 23, 2013 at 06:14 PM
You have made one of my points perfecly. "I won't be your friend if you don't do what I say" (in my opinion) is not bullying. And I believe that our schools and our society have not only NOT taught our children how to handle difficult situations, we have gone totally in the opposite direction. So much time and energy is spent making sure that their delicate self esteem is not injured, and that they are never made to suffer failure or given the opportunity to learn from mistakes that when they do go on to middle school and there is less opportunity for adult intervention and protection our youth are at a loss as to how to handle it. I believe that there is truly bullying behavior out there and but what I stand by is that it is an overused and not clearly understood term. Kids will always be mean. But mean is not always being a bully.
Lorne Gold January 30, 2013 at 02:26 AM
With his article, Dr. Freedman ichpse to take the great and difficult challenge of fairly summarizing, in a very short space, with few words, a fairly lengthy (by comparison) and much more complex and in depth article by Susan Porter. I suggest that the readers, before cementing about Dr. Freedman's blog entry, are best served by themselves reading Ms. Porter's article and considering Dr. Freedmans thoughts as a companion piece to it. Her article can be read here: http://www.triangledayschool.org/sites/default/files/common/Bullying%20Article.pdf
Lorne Gold January 30, 2013 at 02:29 AM
I apologize for the spelling errors. Small keys + autocorrect.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »